Anonymous user
Talk:Function composition: Difference between revisions
to me it's ok
(there must be a way... I will think about it ...) |
(to me it's ok) |
||
Line 14:
:::Hm, I was thinking about other (not portable...) methods; I will try... ;) --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 22:15, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
::: Spoon! I think you beated me:D At the beginning I was following a method similar to yours (except that I called ''function capsule'' something similar to what you called functor). But I was dissatisfied since this works only for function with double arg and returning double; I was thinking about a way of composing functions not dependently by the type of the value passed/returned, I thought to ''encapsulate'' the function in a function (!) which wants void * as input and ret value, and then it can be "dereferenced" and casted properly by the programmer (and a macro facility)... I was experimenting different methods (also using inline assembly:D) ... at the moment, failing:(... so I calm down unless your solution is marked as not ok for the task :D. Interesting. --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 23:26, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
| |||