Page history
Talk:Unicode strings
22 November 2012
17 November 2012
24 October 2011
3 August 2011
25 July 2011
23 July 2011
rosettacode>Markhobley
I haven't stated my "points of view".
m+210
rosettacode>Ledrug
→New task description
+560
rosettacode>Markhobley
→New task description
m+543
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→New task description: Liked the original.
+371
rosettacode>Markhobley
I found some more sales pitch
m+257
rosettacode>Markhobley
New task description
+1,137
22 July 2011
rosettacode>Markhobley
The 510k estimate
m−2
rosettacode>Markhobley
The 510k estimate
m+471
rosettacode>Ledrug
→The task description change
+239
rosettacode>Markhobley
We could merge the Unicode tasks into one task
m+472
rosettacode>Markhobley
I am sure that it must be possible to demonstrate handling of UTF16.
m+257
rosettacode>Ledrug
→The task description change: the problem is they were *not* requirements
+899
rosettacode>Markhobley
Where is the problem?
m+1,362
Sonia
→The task description change: seconded
+238
rosettacode>Ledrug
objection to changes
+503