Page history
Talk:Sum to 100
25 March 2024
11 July 2017
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→a discussion of the task's requirements and wording: elided a stray right parenthesis.
m−1
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→a discussion of the task's requirements and wording: added comments.
+1,653
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
moved a section of comments from the task's preamble to the talk page.
+1,597
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→a discussion of the task's requirements and wording: moved comments from the task's requirements to the talk page.
+1,595
25 February 2017
17 February 2017
5 January 2017
Hout
→extra credit
+63
Hout
→extra credit
+277
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→extra credit: added a comment about including an "extra credit" (optional) requirement.
+248
Hout
→extra credit: N largest sums doesn't seem to much affect the run-time, at least in the case of Haskell
+213
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→complete list of the number of solutions for zero ──► 300: added a new talk section.
+10,518
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→extra credit: moved the complete list of solutions of "9" from the "page" area.
m+2,417
1 January 2017
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
added a new talk section.
+403
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
added comments.
m+864
Hout
An 'existence proof' would be fine
+386
Hout
→A 'sum' that can be shown but not expressed ?
+28
Hout
→A 'sum' that can be shown but not expressed ?
+415
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
added some clarification to a phrase.
m+29
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
added more comments.
+860
Hout
→A 'sum' that can be shown but not expressed ?
+393
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
added a comment.
m+261
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→A 'sum' that can be shown but not expressed ?: tried to explain the wording used and interpretations of words used, answered a question.
m+1,293
Hout
Apparently not the lowest integer that can't be constructed this way, but then what is this thing that can be 'shown' but not 'expressed' ?
+634