Page history
Talk:S-expressions
25 January 2023
Schweick
→JavaScript version bugfix for \" and \n in strings: added example
+109
Schweick
JavaScript, bugfix for \" and \n in strings
+1,567
7 November 2020
16 May 2020
27 April 2017
Hout
→Haskell version failing with GHC 7.10.3 and current Stack
+3
Hout
→Haskell version failing with GHC 7.10.3 and current Stack
m−4
Hout
Haskell version failing to compile with GHC 7.10.3
+363
26 October 2012
rosettacode>EMBee
→Existing Standards: typo
mrosettacode>EMBee
→extend task for Associative Arrays, Mappings, Dictionarys?: new section
+912
rosettacode>EMBee
→A bit late to add the extra credit?
m+2
rosettacode>EMBee
→A bit late to add the extra credit?
+310
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→A bit late to add the extra credit?
+415
24 June 2012
rosettacode>EMBee
→Writer in seperate subtask?: typo
mrosettacode>EMBee
→Writer in seperate subtask?
+158
rosettacode>EMBee
→Lisp Solutions: a real parser in lisp is still welcome
+1,077
23 June 2012
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Lisp Solutions: S-exp inspired.
+261
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Lisp Solutions: Seems OK to me.
+198
rosettacode>Lhignight
→Lisp Solutions
+332
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Lisp Solutions: If you don't have to build an explicit parser then that should be OK.
+393
22 June 2012
4 November 2011
rosettacode>EMBee
→TCL native types
m+34
rosettacode>Dkf
→TCL native types: Some of what I was thinking about
+834
rosettacode>EMBee
→syntax for S-Expressions: someone in #lisp linked to the original definition of s-expressions
+199
3 November 2011
rosettacode>EMBee
→TCL native types
+308
rosettacode>Ledrug
→TCL native types
+240
rosettacode>EMBee
→TCL native types: new section
+569
21 October 2011
Rdm
→practical solutions preferred
+152
rosettacode>EMBee
→How about concentrating on the example?
+446
20 October 2011
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→How about concentrating on the example?: Remember this...
+199
rosettacode>EMBee
→lisp solutions
m+9
rosettacode>EMBee
→lisp solutions: new section
+662
rosettacode>EMBee
→How about concentrating on the example?
+620
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→How about concentrating on the example?: link to Linked list
+16
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→How about concentrating on the example?: indent
m+2
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→How about concentrating on the example?: Too much removed.
+626
rosettacode>EMBee
→Existing Standards
+385
rosettacode>EMBee
→How about concentrating on the example?
+419
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→How about concentrating on the example?
+1,138
24.85.131.247
→Existing Standards: Discussion of character syntax types in CL.
+1,667
rosettacode>EMBee
→Existing Standards
m−2
rosettacode>EMBee
→Existing Standards
+285
rosettacode>EMBee
→J
+732
rosettacode>EMBee
move the syntax sections to the top
−1
192.139.122.42
→Existing Standards
+543
19 October 2011
Rdm
→practical solutions preferred
m+1
Rdm
→practical solutions preferred
m+180
192.139.122.42
→practical solutions preferred: Clarifying where another user's broken-up comment ends and begins-again, with replicated time and signature.
+83
192.139.122.42
→practical solutions preferred
+4,108
Rdm
→J
+823
Rdm
Undo revision 123363 by Rdm (talk)
−422