Page history
27 July 2013
24 July 2013
Walterpachl
→REXX vs ooRexx: a Problem in the REXX solution?
+645
Walterpachl
→REXX vs ooRexx: thanks
+147
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→REXX vs ooRexx: specified which REXXes failed with a (non-classic) REXX example. -- ~~~~
+1,111
Walterpachl
→REXX vs ooRexx: new section
+217
3 July 2012
29 March 2012
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→"Standard": added ubiquitous comma use. -- ~~~~
m+447
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→current task: corrected typo. -- ~~~~
mrosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→"Standard": more comments on (people) names. -- ~~~~
m+249
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→"Standard": added answer to what's not clear. -- ~~~~
m+1,880
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→current task: questioning the need for the archaic word: speeling. -- ~~~~
m+269
24 April 2011
rosettacode>Markhobley
Which part of the format is not clear from the example?
+692
rosettacode>Markhobley
→current task
+421
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→"Standard": Work on the description or change the "standard"?
+433
rosettacode>Dkf
→"Standard": More nitpicking
+268
rosettacode>Dkf
→"Standard": Still not nailed…
+447
28 February 2011
21 February 2011
16 February 2011
MikeMol
→"Standard": Agreed.
+223
rosettacode>Jofur
→"Standard": language specific?
m+217
Tikkanz
→"Standard": +1
+136
rosettacode>Kevin Reid
“standard”
+324
11 February 2011
rosettacode>Kernigh
So I wrote a Ruby example...
+351
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→current task: +1 on .ini file format
+611