Page history
6 March 2022
5 March 2022
rosettacode>Anonymous31415927
Undo revision 355087 by Rdm (talk)
+1,159
Hout
→Dependence on a potentially insecure direct link to a JPEG: fixed minor typo
m−1
Rdm
Oops, reverted to wrong point -- see message on my previous edit for reasoning for reversion
−1,158
Rdm
I am reverting this, because our anonymous friend does not understand "urban legend" vs "history" See also cve-2010-0517, CVE-2011-0217, https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/862, etc.
m−262
rosettacode>Anonymous31415927
→Dependence on a potentially insecure direct link to a JPEG
m+262
Hout
→Dependence on a potentially insecure direct link to a JPEG: fixed minor typo
m−1
rosettacode>Anonymous31415927
→Dependence on a potentially insecure direct link to a JPEG
m+2
rosettacode>Anonymous31415927
Undo revision 355059 by Rdm (talk)
+1,156
4 March 2022
Rdm
removed anonymous comment which apparently claimed that https://www.cvedetails.com/cve/CVE-2004-0200/ did not happen.
m−75
rosettacode>Anonymous31415927
→Dependence on a potentially insecure direct link to a JPEG
+76
17 February 2022
PureFox
→Dependence on a potentially insecure direct link to a JPEG: Supplementary remarks.
+343
PureFox
Edited previous comment.
m+18
PureFox
More comments
+411
Thundergnat
Thundergnat moved page Talk:Special identity matrix with two diagonals to Talk:Matrix with two diagonals: It's not special and it's not an identity
mHout
→Dependence on a potentially insecure direct link to a JPEG
+144
Hout
→Dependence on a potentially insecure direct link to a JPEG
+271
PureFox
→Dependence on a potentially insecure direct link to a JPEG: Further comments.
+774
Hout
→Dependence on a potentially insecure direct link to a JPEG
+378
Hout
→Dependence on a potentially insecure direct link to a JPEG
+253
PureFox
→Dependence on a potentially insecure direct link to a JPEG: Commented.
+420
Hout
Dependence on a potentially insecure direct link to a JPEG
+476