Page history
27 September 2018
26 September 2018
Hout
Well spotted !
+138
PureFox
Reply re discrepancy in Python results.
+389
Hout
Perhaps try removing the mutation ?
+306
Hout
Removed a red herring (false path) now replaced by list of some gaps
−608
Hout
Some gaps: (8, 15, 13), (16, 30, 26), (24, 45, 39), (32, 60, 52) etc ... up to (4704, 8820, 7644)
+356
Hout
perhaps the different stages at which we sorting are causing tests to diverge
+183
Hout
no edit summary
m+2
Hout
→The two different python methods that I developed together
+421
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→How to verify the number of triangles for the extra credit?: The two different python methods that I developed together
+3,324
25 September 2018
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→How to verify the number of triangles for the extra credit?: method2
+432
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→How to verify the number of triangles for the extra credit?: Yet another answer.
+565
24 September 2018
PureFox
Changed 'function' to 'operator'.
mPureFox
Responded to how to verify the number of triangles for the extra credit.
+496
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→How to verify the number of triangles for the extra credit?: Cross check?
+477
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
/* How to verify the number of trianangles for the ''extra credit''? ==
+411
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→Showing the sides in order?: added a comment.
+367