Page history
Talk:Josephus problem
30 June 2020
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Categorisation of solutions: Indices.
m+220
ReeceGoding
no edit summary
+425
Petelomax
→Categorisation of solutions: sp
mPetelomax
→Categorisation of solutions: R[2]
+457
27 June 2020
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→failings of languages not working with other languages: added some comments.
m+1,220
ReeceGoding
→Categorisation of solutions
+153
Petelomax
→Categorisation of solutions
−8
Petelomax
→Categorisation of solutions: Forth, ta
+1
Chunes
→Categorisation of solutions: forth
+215
Petelomax
→Categorisation of solutions
+50
Petelomax
→Categorisation of solutions
−1
Petelomax
→Categorisation of solutions
+2,941
24 June 2020
ReeceGoding
no edit summary
+170
ReeceGoding
→Categorisation of solutions
+134
Chunes
→Categorisation of solutions: add some more thoughts
m+190
Chunes
→Categorisation of solutions: fix a typo
mChunes
→Categorisation of solutions: add explanation for Factor solution
+1,082
ReeceGoding
→Categorisation of solutions
m−1
ReeceGoding
→Categorisation of solutions
m−1
ReeceGoding
→Categorisation of solutions: new section
+3,687
31 October 2016
Hout
→Formulae hidden to most browsers by under-tested cosmetic edits at 17:36, 21 April 2016
+129
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Formulae hidden to most browsers by under-tested cosmetic edits at 17:36, 21 April 2016: Apologies.
m+128
28 October 2016
Thundergnat
Thanks!
+109
Hout
→Formulae hidden to most browsers by under-tested cosmetic edits at 17:36, 21 April 2016
+270
Hout
→Formulae hidden to most browsers by under-tested cosmetic edits at 17:36, 21 April 2016
+127
Thundergnat
Kinda destructive edit, that last one...
+407
Hout
→Formulae hidden to most browsers by under-tested cosmetic edits at 17:36, 21 April 2016
+156
23 September 2016
Hout
→Formulae hidden to most browsers by under-tested cosmetic edits at 17:36, 21 April 2016
Hout
→Formulae hidden to most browsers by under-tested cosmetic edits at 17:36, 21 April 2016
+79
Hout
→Formulae hidden to most browsers by under-tested cosmetic edits at 17:36, 21 April 2016
+20
Hout
→Formulae hidden to most browsers by under-tested cosmetic edits at 17:36, 21 April 2016
−5
Hout
→Formulae hidden to most browsers by under-tested cosmetic edits at 17:36, 21 April 2016
+1,135
Walterpachl
formatting
m−71
Walterpachl
→Formulae hidden to most browsers by under-tested cosmetic edits at 17:36, 21 April 2016: nuisance
m+203
22 September 2016
11 May 2013
Walterpachl
→failings of languages not working with other languages: actually it's not languages that fail but programs
+325
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→failings of languages not working with other languages: added a clarifying statement. -- ~~~~
+177
10 May 2013
Walterpachl
→failings of languages not working with other languages: category to use for a non-oo-Rexx program
+418
Walterpachl
→failings of languages not working with other languages: plea for help and advice rather than argumenting
+1,204
rosettacode>Alansam
Bah humbug!
+282
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→failings of languages not working with other languages: added a comment about sysplex software availability. -- ~~~~
+297
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
→failings of languages not working with other languages: added various comments concerning REXX variants. -- ~~~~
+5,899
9 May 2013
Walterpachl
→failings of languages not working with other languages: one more :-(
mWalterpachl
→failings of languages not working with other languages: try to make the quotes visible
mWalterpachl
→failings of languages not working with other languages: where REXX programs should be shown
+869
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→failings of languages not working with other languages: I don't know REXX but ...
+895
Walterpachl
added link to the difference discussion
+126
Walterpachl
typos corrected and plea for second opinoin(s).
+211
Walterpachl
ooRexx is, to 99.9 percent, a classic Rexx Interpreter! Why deny this and "fight" forever?
+674
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→failings of languages not working with other languages: Whoops.
m+86