Page history
Talk:Egyptian division
24 August 2017
Thundergnat
Reverted edits by Thundergnat (talk) to last revision by Hout
m−155
Thundergnat
→Haskell 'lazy lists' example: 2nd point
m+155
Hout
Haskell 'lazy lists' example: Returning a remainder, and adding to self, rather than using a multiplication operator ?
+473
12 August 2017
11 August 2017
Hout
→Number Systems
+276
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Number Systems: (sign)
m+86
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Number Systems: P.S.
+207
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Number Systems: Interesting, but different rather than better?
+541
Hout
→Number Systems
+13
Hout
→Number Systems
+5
Hout
→Number Systems
+878
Thundergnat
→Number Systems: Sheesh
+784
Hout
→Number Systems
Hout
→Number Systems
+4
Hout
→Number Systems: Good point – I would second a refocusing of the task description on deriving division from + and - without * / ^ etc
+648
Hout
→Perhaps no need to ask for more than one array ?
+401
Nigel Galloway
→Perhaps no need to ask for more than one array ?
+464
Nigel Galloway
no edit summary
+568
10 August 2017
Hout
→Perhaps no need to ask for more than one array ?: Formatting
m−46
Hout
→Perhaps no need to ask for more than one array ?
+675
Hout
Trying to get the wiki link right :-)
+23
Hout
→Perhaps no need to ask for more than one array ?
−30
Hout
→Perhaps no need to ask for more than one array ?
−1
Hout
→Perhaps no need to ask for more than one array ?
+523
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Perhaps no need to ask for more than one array ?: What I was thinking of ...
+242
Thundergnat
Agreed
+290
Hout
→Perhaps no need to ask for more than one array ?
+10
Hout
→Perhaps no need to ask for more than one array ?
+1
Hout
→Perhaps no need to ask for more than one array ?
m−6
Hout
Perhaps the request for two arrays (rather than a single array of pairs) could be reformulated ?
+301