Page history
Talk:Closest-pair problem
22 September 2020
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
added a (forced) TOC.
m+9
rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger
added a section header for the 1st talk section.
m+29
6 February 2010
25 October 2009
rosettacode>ShinTakezou
→Comment on Algorithms Given
+239
rosettacode>ShinTakezou
→Comment on Algorithms Given
+575
24 October 2009
18 October 2009
14 October 2009
13 October 2009
10 October 2009
21 May 2009
12 May 2009
rosettacode>ShinTakezou
→Comment on Algorithms Given
+411
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Comment on Algorithms Given: Dumb.
+623
rosettacode>ShinTakezou
→About this task: (corrected the link for real!)
m+7
rosettacode>ShinTakezou
→About this task: corrected the link, plus stressed the update of the pseudocode
+289
rosettacode>ShinTakezou
→Comment on Algorithms Given
+1,435
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→Comment on Algorithms Given: link to "Critique of pseudocode explanations of the Closest Pair Algorithm"
+209
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→About this task
m+33
11 May 2009
rosettacode>Paddy3118
→About this task: Another reference?
+215
rosettacode>ShinTakezou
→About this task
+412
rosettacode>ShinTakezou
→About this task: up to implementations keeping track of the points...?
+591
rosettacode>Mwn3d
→About this task: What about the points?
+310
rosettacode>ShinTakezou
→About this task: mark pseudocode as "in need of review"? :D
+331
rosettacode>ShinTakezou
ok for implementors; pseudocode don't need to be optimized
+298
rosettacode>ShinTakezou
→About this task: new section
+1,381