Rosetta Code

Self numbers

Revision as of 01:29, 21 October 2020 by Petelomax (talk | contribs) (→‎{{header|Phix}}: updated comments inline with AppleScrpt entry, and removed an over-eagerly inserted 7&0)

A number n is a self number if there is no number g such that g + the sum of g's digits = n. So 18 is not a self number because 9+9=18, 43 is not a self number because 35+5+3=43.
The task is:

Task
Self numbers
You are encouraged to solve this task according to the task description, using any language you may know.
 Display the first 50 self numbers;
 I believe that the 100000000th self number is 1022727208. You should either confirm or dispute my conjecture.

224036583-1 is a Mersenne prime, claimed to also be a self number. Extra credit to anyone proving it.

See also

AppleScript

I couldn't follow the math in the Wikipedia entry, nor the discussion and code here so far. But an initial expedient of generating a list of all the integers from 1 to just over ten times the required number of results and then deleting those that could be derived using the described method revealed the sequencing pattern on which the code below is based.

<lang applescript>(* 

   Base-10 self numbers by index (single or range).
   Follows an observed sequence pattern whereby, after the initial single-digit odd numbers, self numbers are
   grouped in runs whose members occur at numeric intervals of 11. Runs after the first one come in blocks of
   ten: eight runs of ten numbers followed by two shorter runs. The numeric interval between runs is usually 2,
   but that between shorter runs, and their length, depend on the highest-order digit change occurring in them.
   This connection with significant digit change means every ten blocks form a higher-order block, every ten
   of these a higher-order-still block, and so on.
   
   The code below appears to be good up to the last self number before 10^12 — ie. 999,999,999,997, which is
   returned as the 97,777,777,792nd such number. After this, instead of zero-length shorter runs, the actual
   pattern apparently starts again with a single run of 10, like the one at the beginning.
  • )

on selfNumbers(indexRange) 

   set indexRange to indexRange as list
   -- Script object with subhandlers and associated properties.
   script |subscript|
       property startIndex : beginning of indexRange
       property endIndex : end of indexRange
       property counter : 0
       property currentSelf : -1
       property output : {}
       
       -- Advance to the next self number in the sequence, append it to the output if required, indicate if finished.
       on doneAfterAdding(interval)
           set currentSelf to currentSelf + interval
           set counter to counter + 1
           if (counter < startIndex) then return false
           set end of my output to currentSelf
           return (counter = endIndex)
       end doneAfterAdding
       
       -- If necessary, fast forward to the last self number before the lowest-order block containing the first number required.
       on fastForward()
           if (counter ≥ startIndex) then return
           -- The highest-order blocks whose ends this script handles correctly contain 9,777,777,778 self numbers.
           -- The difference between equivalently positioned numbers in these blocks is 100,000,000,001.
           -- The figures for successively lower-order blocks have successively fewer 7s and 0s!
           set indexDiff to 9.777777778E+9
           set numericDiff to 1.00000000001E+11
           repeat until ((indexDiff < 98) or (counter = startIndex))
               set test to counter + indexDiff
               if (test < startIndex) then
                   set counter to test
                   set currentSelf to (currentSelf + numericDiff)
               else
                   set indexDiff to (indexDiff + 2) div 10
                   set numericDiff to numericDiff div 10 + 1
               end if
           end repeat
       end fastForward
       
       -- Work out a shorter run length based on the most significant digit change about to happen.
       on getShorterRunLength()
           set shorterRunLength to 9
           set temp to (|subscript|'s currentSelf) div 1000
           repeat while (temp mod 10 is 9)
               set shorterRunLength to shorterRunLength - 1
               set temp to temp div 10
           end repeat
           return shorterRunLength
       end getShorterRunLength
   end script
   
   -- Main process. Start with the single-digit odd numbers and first run.
   repeat 5 times
       if (|subscript|'s doneAfterAdding(2)) then return |subscript|'s output
   end repeat
   repeat 9 times
       if (|subscript|'s doneAfterAdding(11)) then return |subscript|'s output
   end repeat
   -- Fast forward if the start index hasn't yet been reached.
   tell |subscript| to fastForward()
   
   -- Sequencing loop, per lowest-order block.
   repeat
       -- Eight ten-number runs, each at a numeric interval of 2 from the end of the previous one.
       repeat 8 times
           if (|subscript|'s doneAfterAdding(2)) then return |subscript|'s output
           repeat 9 times
               if (|subscript|'s doneAfterAdding(11)) then return |subscript|'s output
           end repeat
       end repeat
       -- Two shorter runs, the second at an interval inversely related to their length.
       set shorterRunLength to |subscript|'s getShorterRunLength()
       repeat with interval in {2, 2 + (10 - shorterRunLength) * 13}
           if (|subscript|'s doneAfterAdding(interval)) then return |subscript|'s output
           repeat (shorterRunLength - 1) times
               if (|subscript|'s doneAfterAdding(11)) then return |subscript|'s output
           end repeat
       end repeat
   end repeat

end selfNumbers

-- Demo calls: -- First to fiftieth self numbers. selfNumbers({1, 50}) --> {1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 20, 31, 42, 53, 64, 75, 86, 97, 108, 110, 121, 132, 143, 154, 165, 176, 187, 198, 209, 211, 222, 233, 244, 255, 266, 277, 288, 299, 310, 312, 323, 334, 345, 356, 367, 378, 389, 400, 411, 413, 424, 435, 446, 457, 468}

-- One hundred millionth: selfNumbers(100000000) --> {1.022727208E+9}

-- 97,777,777,792nd: selfNumbers(9.7777777792E+10) --> {9.99999999997E+11}</lang>

C

Sieve based

Translation of: Go

About 25% faster than Go (using GCC 7.5.0 -O3) mainly due to being able to iterate through the sieve using a pointer. <lang c>#include <stdio.h>

  1. include <stdlib.h>
  2. include <time.h>

typedef unsigned char bool;

  1. define TRUE 1
  2. define FALSE 0
  3. define MILLION 1000000
  4. define BILLION 1000 * MILLION
  5. define MAX_COUNT 2*BILLION + 9*9 + 1

void sieve(bool *sv) { 

   int n = 0, s[8], a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j;
   for (a = 0; a < 2; ++a) {
       for (b = 0; b < 10; ++b) {
           s[0] = a + b;
           for (c = 0; c < 10; ++c) {
               s[1] = s[0] + c;
               for (d = 0; d < 10; ++d) {
                   s[2] = s[1] + d;
                   for (e = 0; e < 10; ++e) {
                       s[3] = s[2] + e;
                       for (f = 0; f < 10; ++f) {
                           s[4] = s[3] + f;
                           for (g = 0; g < 10; ++g) {
                               s[5] = s[4] + g;
                               for (h = 0; h < 10; ++h) {
                                   s[6] = s[5] + h;
                                   for (i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
                                       s[7] = s[6] + i;
                                       for (j = 0; j < 10; ++j) {
                                           sv[s[7] + j+ n++] = TRUE;
                                       }
                                   }
                               }
                           }
                       }
                   }
               }
           }
       }
   }

}

int main() { 

   int count = 0;
   clock_t begin = clock();
   bool *p, *sv = (bool*) calloc(MAX_COUNT, sizeof(bool));
   sieve(sv);
   printf("The first 50 self numbers are:\n");
   for (p = sv; p < sv + MAX_COUNT; ++p) {
       if (!*p) {
           if (++count <= 50) printf("%ld ", p-sv);
           if (count == 100 * MILLION) {
               printf("\n\nThe 100 millionth self number is %ld\n", p-sv);
               break;
           }
       }
   }
   free(sv);
   printf("Took %lf seconds.\n", (double)(clock() - begin) / CLOCKS_PER_SEC);
   return 0;

}</lang>

Output:
The first 50 self numbers are:
1 3 5 7 9 20 31 42 53 64 75 86 97 108 110 121 132 143 154 165 176 187 198 209 211 222 233 244 255 266 277 288 299 310 312 323 334 345 356 367 378 389 400 411 413 424 435 446 457 468 

The 100 millionth self number is 1022727208
Took 1.521486 seconds.

Extended

Translation of: Pascal

<lang c>#include <stdio.h>

  1. include <stdlib.h>
  2. include <time.h>

typedef unsigned char bool;

  1. define TRUE 1
  2. define FALSE 0
  3. define MILLION 1000000LL
  4. define BILLION 1000 * MILLION
  5. define MAX_COUNT 103LL*10000*10000 + 11*9 + 1

int digitSum[10000];

void init() { 

   int i = 9999, s, t, a, b, c, d;
   for (a = 9; a >= 0; --a) {
       for (b = 9; b >= 0; --b) {
           s = a + b;
           for (c = 9; c >= 0; --c) {
               t = s + c;
               for (d = 9; d >= 0; --d) {
                   digitSum[i] = t + d;
                   --i;
               }
           }
       }
   }

}

void sieve(bool *sv) { 

   int a, b, c;
   long long s, n = 0;
   for (a = 0; a < 103; ++a) {
       for (b = 0; b < 10000; ++b) {
           s = digitSum[a] + digitSum[b] + n;
           for (c = 0; c < 10000; ++c) {
               sv[digitSum[c]+s] = TRUE;
               ++s;
           }
           n += 10000;
       }
   }

}

int main() { 

   long long count = 0, limit = 1;
   clock_t begin = clock(), end;
   bool *p, *sv = (bool*) calloc(MAX_COUNT, sizeof(bool));
   init();
   sieve(sv);
   printf("Sieving took %lf seconds.\n", (double)(clock() - begin) / CLOCKS_PER_SEC);
   printf("\nThe first 50 self numbers are:\n");
   for (p = sv; p < sv + MAX_COUNT; ++p) {
       if (!*p) {
           if (++count <= 50) {
               printf("%ld ", p-sv);
           } else {
               printf("\n\n     Index  Self number\n");
               break;
           }
       }
   }
   count = 0;
   for (p = sv; p < sv + MAX_COUNT; ++p) {
       if (!*p) {
           if (++count == limit) {
               printf("%10lld  %11ld\n", count, p-sv);
               limit *= 10;
               if (limit == 10 * BILLION) break;
           }
       }
   }
   free(sv);                    
   printf("\nOverall took %lf seconds.\n", (double)(clock() - begin) / CLOCKS_PER_SEC);
   return 0;

}</lang>

Output:
Sieving took 7.429969 seconds.

The first 50 self numbers are:
1 3 5 7 9 20 31 42 53 64 75 86 97 108 110 121 132 143 154 165 176 187 198 209 211 222 233 244 255 266 277 288 299 310 312 323 334 345 356 367 378 389 400 411 413 424 435 446 457 468 

     Index  Self number
         1            1
        10           64
       100          973
      1000        10188
     10000       102225
    100000      1022675
   1000000     10227221
  10000000    102272662
 100000000   1022727208
1000000000  10227272649

Overall took 11.574158 seconds.

C#

Translation of: Pascal

via

Translation of: Go

(third version) Stripped down, as C# limits the size of an array to Int32.MaxValue, so the sieve isn't large enough to hit the 1,000,000,000th value.

<lang csharp>using System; using static System.Console;

class Program { 

 const int mc = 103 * 1000 * 10000 + 11 * 9 + 1;

 static bool[] sv = new bool[mc + 1];

 static void sieve() { int[] dS = new int[10000];
   for (int a = 9, i = 9999; a >= 0; a--)
     for (int b = 9; b >= 0; b--)
       for (int c = 9, s = a + b; c >= 0; c--)
         for (int d = 9, t = s + c; d >= 0; d--)
           dS[i--] = t + d;
   for (int a = 0, n = 0; a < 103; a++)
     for (int b = 0, d = dS[a]; b < 1000; b++, n += 10000)
       for (int c = 0, s = d + dS[b] + n; c < 10000; c++)
         sv[dS[c] + s++] = true; }

 static void Main() { DateTime st = DateTime.Now; sieve();
   WriteLine("Sieving took {0}s", (DateTime.Now - st).TotalSeconds); 
   WriteLine("\nThe first 50 self numbers are:");
   for (int i = 0, count = 0; count <= 50; i++) if (!sv[i]) {
       count++; if (count <= 50) Write("{0} ", i);
       else WriteLine("\n\n       Index     Self number"); }
   for (int i = 0, limit = 1, count = 0; i < mc; i++)
     if (!sv[i]) if (++count == limit) {
         WriteLine("{0,12:n0}   {1,13:n0}", count, i);
         if (limit == 1e9) break; limit *= 10; }
   WriteLine("\nOverall took {0}s", (DateTime.Now - st). TotalSeconds);
 }

}</lang>

Output:

Timing from tio.run 

Sieving took 3.4266187s

The first 50 self numbers are:
1 3 5 7 9 20 31 42 53 64 75 86 97 108 110 121 132 143 154 165 176 187 198 209 211 222 233 244 255 266 277 288 299 310 312 323 334 345 356 367 378 389 400 411 413 424 435 446 457 468 

       Index     Self number
           1               1
          10              64
         100             973
       1,000          10,188
      10,000         102,225
     100,000       1,022,675
   1,000,000      10,227,221
  10,000,000     102,272,662
 100,000,000   1,022,727,208

Overall took 7.0237244s

Elixir

<lang elixir> defmodule SelfNums do 

 def digAndSum(number) when is_number(number) do
   Integer.digits(number) |>
   Enum.reduce( 0, fn(num, acc) -> num + acc end ) |>
   (fn(x) -> x + number end).()
 end

 def selfFilter(list, firstNth) do
   numRange = Enum.to_list 1..firstNth
   numRange -- list 
 end

end

defmodule SelfTest do 

 import SelfNums

 stop = 468

 Enum.to_list 1..stop |>
 Enum.map(&digAndSum/1) |>
 SelfNums.selfFilter(stop) |>
 IO.inspect

end </lang>

Output:
[1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 20, 31, 42, 53, 64, 75, 86, 97, 108, 110, 121, 132, 143, 154,
 165, 176, 187, 198, 209, 211, 222, 233, 244, 255, 266, 277, 288, 299, 310, 312,
 323, 334, 345, 356, 367, 378, 389, 400, 411, 413, 424, 435, 446, 457, 468]

F#

<lang fsharp> // Self numbers. Nigel Galloway: October 6th., 2020 let fN g=let rec fG n g=match n/10 with 0->n+g |i->fG i (g+(n%10)) in fG g g let Self=let rec Self n i g=seq{let g=g@([n..i]|>List.map fN) in yield! List.except g [n..i]; yield! Self (n+100) (i+100) (List.filter(fun n->n>i) g)} in Self 0 99 []

Self |> Seq.take 50 |> Seq.iter(printf "%d "); printfn "" printfn "\n%d" (Seq.item 99999999 Self) </lang>

Output:
1 3 5 7 9 20 31 42 53 64 75 86 97 108 110 121 132 143 154 165 176 187 198 209 211 222 233 244 255 266 277 288 299 310 312 323 334 345 356 367 378 389 400 411 413 424 435 446 457 468

1022727208

Go

Low memory

Simple-minded, uses very little memory (no sieve) but slow - over 2.5 minutes. <lang go>package main

import ( 

   "fmt"
   "time"

)

func sumDigits(n int) int { 

   sum := 0
   for n > 0 {
       sum += n % 10
       n /= 10
   }
   return sum

}

func max(x, y int) int { 

   if x > y {
       return x
   }
   return y

}

func main() { 

   st := time.Now()
   count := 0
   var selfs []int
   i := 1
   pow := 10
   digits := 1
   offset := 9
   lastSelf := 0
   for count < 1e8 {
       isSelf := true
       start := max(i-offset, 0)
       sum := sumDigits(start)
       for j := start; j < i; j++ {
           if j+sum == i {
               isSelf = false
               break
           }
           if (j+1)%10 != 0 {
               sum++
           } else {
               sum = sumDigits(j + 1)
           }
       }
       if isSelf {
           count++
           lastSelf = i
           if count <= 50 {
               selfs = append(selfs, i)
               if count == 50 {
                   fmt.Println("The first 50 self numbers are:")
                   fmt.Println(selfs)
               }
           }
       }
       i++
       if i%pow == 0 {
           pow *= 10
           digits++
           offset = digits * 9
       }
   }
   fmt.Println("\nThe 100 millionth self number is", lastSelf)
   fmt.Println("Took", time.Since(st))

}</lang>

Output:
The first 50 self numbers are:
[1 3 5 7 9 20 31 42 53 64 75 86 97 108 110 121 132 143 154 165 176 187 198 209 211 222 233 244 255 266 277 288 299 310 312 323 334 345 356 367 378 389 400 411 413 424 435 446 457 468]

The 100 millionth self number is 1022727208
Took 2m35.531949399s

Sieve based

Simple sieve, requires a lot of memory but quick - around 2 seconds.

Nested 'for's used rather than a recursive function for extra speed.

Have also incorporated Enter your username's suggestion (see Talk page) of using partial sums for each loop which improves performance by about 25%. <lang go>package main

import ( 

   "fmt"
   "time"

)

func sieve() []bool { 

   sv := make([]bool, 2*1e9+9*9 + 1)
   n := 0
   var s [8]int
   for a := 0; a < 2; a++ {
       for b := 0; b < 10; b++ {
           s[0] = a + b
           for c := 0; c < 10; c++ {
               s[1] = s[0] + c
               for d := 0; d < 10; d++ {
                   s[2] = s[1] + d
                   for e := 0; e < 10; e++ {
                       s[3] = s[2] + e
                       for f := 0; f < 10; f++ {
                           s[4] = s[3] + f
                           for g := 0; g < 10; g++ {
                               s[5] = s[4] + g
                               for h := 0; h < 10; h++ {
                                   s[6] = s[5] + h 
                                   for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
                                       s[7] = s[6] + i
                                       for j := 0; j < 10; j++ {
                                           sv[s[7]+j+n] = true
                                           n++
                                       }
                                   }
                               }
                           }
                       }
                   }
               }
           }
       }
   }
   return sv

}

func main() { 

   st := time.Now()
   sv := sieve()
   count := 0
   fmt.Println("The first 50 self numbers are:")
   for i := 0; i < len(sv); i++ {
       if !sv[i] {
           count++
           if count <= 50 {
               fmt.Printf("%d ", i)
           }
           if count == 1e8 {
               fmt.Println("\n\nThe 100 millionth self number is", i)
               break
           }
       }
   }
   fmt.Println("Took", time.Since(st))

}</lang>

Output:
The first 50 self numbers are:
1 3 5 7 9 20 31 42 53 64 75 86 97 108 110 121 132 143 154 165 176 187 198 209 211 222 233 244 255 266 277 288 299 310 312 323 334 345 356 367 378 389 400 411 413 424 435 446 457 468 

The 100 millionth self number is 1022727208
Took 1.984969034s

Extended

Translation of: Pascal

This uses horst.h's ideas (see Talk page) to find up to the 1 billionth self number in a reasonable time and using less memory than the simple 'sieve based' approach above would have needed. <lang go>package main

import ( 

   "fmt"
   "time"

)

const MAX_COUNT = 103*1e4*1e4 + 11*9 + 1

var sv = make([]bool, MAX_COUNT+1) var digitSum = make([]int, 1e4)

func init() { 

   i := 9999
   var s, t int
   for a := 9; a >= 0; a-- {
       for b := 9; b >= 0; b-- {
           s = a + b
           for c := 9; c >= 0; c-- {
               t = s + c
               for d := 9; d >= 0; d-- {
                   digitSum[i] = t + d
                   i--
               }
           }
       }
   }

}

func sieve() { 

   n := 0
   for a := 0; a < 103; a++ {
       for b := 0; b < 1e4; b++ {
           s := digitSum[a] + digitSum[b] + n
           for c := 0; c < 1e4; c++ {
               sv[digitSum[c]+s] = true
               s++
           }
           n += 1e4
       }
   }

}

func main() { 

   st := time.Now()
   sieve()
   fmt.Println("Sieving took", time.Since(st))
   count := 0
   fmt.Println("\nThe first 50 self numbers are:")
   for i := 0; i < len(sv); i++ {
       if !sv[i] {
           count++
           if count <= 50 {
               fmt.Printf("%d ", i)
           } else {
               fmt.Println("\n\n     Index  Self number")
               break
           }
       }
   }
   count = 0
   limit := 1
   for i := 0; i < len(sv); i++ {
       if !sv[i] {
           count++
           if count == limit {
               fmt.Printf("%10d  %11d\n", count, i)
               limit *= 10
               if limit == 1e10 {
                   break
               }
           }
       }
   }
   fmt.Println("\nOverall took", time.Since(st))

}</lang>

Output:
Sieving took 8.286841692s

The first 50 self numbers are:
1 3 5 7 9 20 31 42 53 64 75 86 97 108 110 121 132 143 154 165 176 187 198 209 211 222 233 244 255 266 277 288 299 310 312 323 334 345 356 367 378 389 400 411 413 424 435 446 457 468 

     Index  Self number
         1            1
        10           64
       100          973
      1000        10188
     10000       102225
    100000      1022675
   1000000     10227221
  10000000    102272662
 100000000   1022727208
1000000000  10227272649

Overall took 14.647314803s

Julia

The code first bootstraps a sliding window of size 81 and then uses this as a sieve. Note that 81 is the window size because the sum of digits of 999,999,999 (the largest digit sum of a counting number less than 1022727208) is 81. <lang julia>gsum(i) = sum(digits(i)) + i isnonself(i) = any(x -> gsum(x) == i, i-1:-1:i-max(1, ndigits(i)*9)) const last81 = filter(isnonself, 1:5000)[1:81]

function checkselfnumbers() 

   i, selfcount = 1, 0
   while selfcount <= 100_000_000 && i <= 1022727208
       if !(i in last81)
           selfcount += 1
           if selfcount < 51
               print(i, " ")
           elseif selfcount == 51
               println()
           elseif selfcount == 100_000_000
               println(i == 1022727208 ?
                   "Yes, $i is the 100,000,000th self number." :
                   "No, instead $i is the 100,000,000th self number.")
           end
       end
       popfirst!(last81)
       push!(last81, gsum(i))
       i += 1
   end

end

checkselfnumbers()

</lang>

Output:
1 3 5 7 9 20 31 42 53 64 75 86 97 108 110 121 132 143 154 165 176 187 198 209 211 222 233 244 255 266 277 288 299 310 312 323 334 345 356 367 378 389 400 411 413 424 435 446 457 468
Yes, 1022727208 is the 100,000,000th self number.

Faster version

Translation of: Pascal

Contains tweaks peculiar to the "10 to the nth" self number. Timings include compilation times. <lang julia>const MAXCOUNT = 103 * 10000 * 10000 + 11 * 9 + 1

function dosieve!(sieve, digitsum9999) 

   n = 1
   for a in 1:103, b in 1:10000
       s = digitsum9999[a] + digitsum9999[b] + n
       for c in 1:10000
           sieve[digitsum9999[c] + s] = true
           s += 1
       end
       n += 10000
   end

end

initdigitsum() = reverse!(vec([sum(k) for k in Iterators.product(9:-1:0, 9:-1:0, 9:-1:0, 9:-1:0)]))

function findselves() 

   sieve = zeros(Bool, MAXCOUNT+1)
   println("Sieve time:")
   @time begin
       digitsum = initdigitsum()
       dosieve!(sieve, digitsum)
   end
   cnt = 1
   for i in 1:MAXCOUNT+1
       if !sieve[i]
           cnt > 50 && break
           print(i, " ")
           cnt += 1
       end
   end
   println()
   limit, cnt = 1, 0
   for i in 0:MAXCOUNT
       cnt += 1 - sieve[i + 1]
       if cnt == limit
           println(lpad(cnt, 10), lpad(i, 12))
           limit *= 10
       end
   end

end

@time findselves()

</lang>

Output:
Sieve time:
  7.187635 seconds (2 allocations: 78.203 KiB)
1 3 5 7 9 20 31 42 53 64 75 86 97 108 110 121 132 143 154 165 176 187 198 209 211 222 233 244 255 266 277 288 299 310 312 323 334 345 356 367 378 389 400 411 413 424 435 446 457 468
         1           1
        10          64
       100         973
      1000       10188
     10000      102225
    100000     1022675
   1000000    10227221
  10000000   102272662
 100000000  1022727208
1000000000 10227272649
 16.999383 seconds (42.92 k allocations: 9.595 GiB, 0.01% gc time)

Pascal

Works with: Free Pascal


Just "sieving" with only one follower of every number

Translation of: Go

Extended to 10.23e9 <lang pascal>program selfnumb; {$IFDEF FPC} 

 {$MODE Delphi}
 {$Optimization ON,ALL}

{$IFEND} {$IFDEF DELPHI} {$APPTYPE CONSOLE} {$IFEND} uses 

 sysutils;

const 

 MAXCOUNT =103*10000*10000+11*9+ 1;

type 

 tDigitSum9999 = array[0..9999] of Uint8;
 tpDigitSum9999 = ^tDigitSum9999;

var 

 DigitSum9999 : tDigitSum9999;
 sieve : array of boolean;

procedure dosieve; var 

 pSieve : pBoolean;
 pDigitSum :tpDigitSum9999;
 n,c,b,a,s : NativeInt;

Begin 

 pSieve := @sieve[0];
 pDigitSum := @DigitSum9999[0];
 n := 0;
 for a := 0 to 102 do
   for b := 0 to 9999 do
   Begin
     s := pDigitSum^[a]+pDigitSum^[b]+n;
     for c := 0 to 9999 do
     Begin
       pSieve[pDigitSum^[c]+s] := true;
       s+=1;
     end;
     inc(n,10000);
   end;

end;

procedure InitDigitSum; var 

 i,d,c,b,a : NativeInt;

begin 

 i := 9999;
 for a := 9 downto 0 do
   for b := 9 downto 0 do
     for c := 9 downto 0 do
       for d := 9 downto 0 do
       Begin
         DigitSum9999[i] := a+b+c+d;
         dec(i);
       end;

end;

procedure OutPut(cnt,i:NativeUint); Begin 

 writeln(cnt:10,i:12);

end;

var 

 pSieve : pboolean;
 T0 : Uint64;
 i,cnt,limit,One: NativeUInt;

BEGIN 

 setlength(sieve,MAXCOUNT);
 pSieve := @sieve[0];
 T0 := GetTickCount64;
 InitDigitSum;
 dosieve;
 writeln('Sievetime : ',(GetTickCount64-T0 )/1000:8:3,' sec');
 //find first 50
 cnt := 0;
 for i := 0 to MAXCOUNT do
 Begin
   if NOT(pSieve[i]) then
   Begin
     inc(cnt);
     if cnt <= 50 then
       write(i:4)
     else
       BREAK;
   end;
 end;
 writeln;
 One := 1;
 limit := One;
 cnt := 0;
 for i := 0 to MAXCOUNT do
 Begin
   inc(cnt,One-Ord(pSieve[i]));
   if cnt = limit then
   Begin
     OutPut(cnt,i);
     limit := limit*10;
   end;
 end;

END.</lang>

Output:
 time ./selfnumb
Sievetime :    6.579 sec
   1   3   5   7   9  20  31  42  53  64  75  86  97 108 110 121 132 143 154 165 176 187 198 209 211 222 233 244 255 266 277 288 299 310 312 323 334 345 356 367 378 389 400 411 413 424 435 446 457 468
         1           1
        10          64
       100         973
      1000       10188
     10000      102225
    100000     1022675
   1000000    10227221
  10000000   102272662
 100000000  1022727208
1000000000 10227272649

real  0m13,252s

Phix

Translation of: AppleScript

Certainly puts my previous rubbish attempts (archived here) to shame.
The precise nature of the difference-pattern eludes me, I will admit. <lang Phix>-- -- Base-10 self numbers by index (single or range). -- Follows an observed sequence pattern whereby, after the initial single-digit odd numbers, self numbers are -- grouped in runs whose members occur at numeric intervals of 11. Runs after the first one come in blocks of -- ten: eight runs of ten numbers followed by two shorter runs. The numeric interval between runs is usually 2, -- but that between shorter runs, and their length, depend on the highest-order digit change occurring in them. -- This connection with significant digit change means every ten blocks form a higher-order block, every ten -- of these a higher-order-still block, and so on. -- -- The code below appears to be good up to the last self number before 10^12 — ie. 999,999,999,997, which is -- returned as the 97,777,777,792nd such number. After this, instead of zero-length shorter runs, the actual -- pattern apparently starts again with a single run of 10, like the one at the beginning. -- integer startIndex, endIndex, counter atom currentSelf sequence output

function doneAfterAdding(integer interval, n) -- Advance to the next self number in the sequence, append it to the output if required, indicate if finished. 

   for i=1 to n do
       currentSelf += interval
       counter += 1
       if counter >= startIndex then
           output &= currentSelf
       end if
       if counter = endIndex then return true end if
   end for
   return false

end function

function selfNumbers(sequence indexRange) 

   startIndex = indexRange[1]
   endIndex = indexRange[$]
   counter = 0
   currentSelf = -1
   output = {}

   -- Main process. Start with the single-digit odd numbers and first run.
   if doneAfterAdding(2,5) then return output end if
   if doneAfterAdding(11,9) then return output end if

   -- If necessary, forward to last self number before the lowest-order block containing first number rqd.
   if counter<startIndex then
       -- The highest-order blocks whose ends this handles correctly contain 9,777,777,778 self numbers.
       -- The difference between equivalently positioned numbers in these blocks is 100,000,000,001.
       -- The figures for successively lower-order blocks have successively fewer 7s and 0s!
       atom indexDiff = 9777777778,
            numericDiff = 100000000001
       while indexDiff>=98 and counter!=startIndex do
           if counter+indexDiff < startIndex then
               counter += indexDiff
               currentSelf += numericDiff
           else
               indexDiff = floor(indexDiff/10) + 1
               numericDiff = floor(numericDiff/10) + 1
           end if
       end while
   end if 

   -- Sequencing loop, per lowest-order block.
   while true do
       -- Eight ten-number runs, each at a numeric interval of 2 from the end of the previous one.
       for i=1 to 8 do
           if doneAfterAdding(2,1) then return output end if
           if doneAfterAdding(11,9) then return output end if
       end for
       -- Two shorter runs, the second at an interval inversely related to their length.
       integer shorterRunLength = 8,
               temp = floor(currentSelf/1000)
       -- Work out a shorter run length based on the most significant digit change about to happen.
       while remainder(temp,10)=9 do
           shorterRunLength -= 1
           temp = floor(temp/10)
       end while

       integer interval = 2
       for i=1 to 2 do
           if doneAfterAdding(interval,1) then return output end if
           if doneAfterAdding(11,shorterRunLength) then return output end if
           interval += (9-shorterRunLength)*13
       end for
   end while

end function

atom t0 = time() printf(1,"The first 50 self numbers are:\n") pp(selfNumbers({1, 50}),{pp_IntFmt,"%3d",pp_IntCh,false}) for p=8 to 9 do 

   integer n = power(10,p)
   printf(1,"The %,dth safe number is %,d\n",{n,selfNumbers({n})[1]})

end for printf(1,"completed in %s\n",elapsed(time()-t0))</lang>

Output:
The first 50 self numbers are:
{  1,  3,  5,  7,  9, 20, 31, 42, 53, 64, 75, 86, 97,108,110,121,132,143,
 154,165,176,187,198,209,211,222,233,244,255,266,277,288,299,310,312,323,
 334,345,356,367,378,389,400,411,413,424,435,446,457,468}
The 100,000,000th safe number is 1,022,727,208
The 1,000,000,000th safe number is 10,227,272,649
completed in 0.1s

REXX

first 50 self numbers

<lang rexx>/*REXX program displays N self numbers (aka Colombian or Devlali numbers). OEIS A3052.*/ parse arg n . /*obtain optional argument from the CL.*/ if n== | n=="," then n= 50 /*Not specified? Then use the default.*/ tell = n>0; n= abs(n) /*TELL: show the self numbers if N>0 */ @.= . /*initialize the array of self numbers.*/ 

          do j=1  for n*10                      /*scan through ten times the #s wanted.*/
          $= j                                  /*1st part of sum is the number itself.*/
                do k=1  for length(j)           /*sum the decimal digits in the number.*/
                $= $ + substr(j, k, 1)          /*add a particular digit to the sum.   */
                end   /*k*/
          @.$=                                  /*mark  J  as not being a self number. */
          end         /*j*/                     /*            ───                      */

list= 1 /*initialize the list to the 1st number*/ 

                #= 1                            /*the count of self numbers  (so far). */
  do i=3  until #==n;  if @.i== then iterate  /*Not a self number?   Then skip it.   */
  #= # + 1;            list= list i             /*bump counter of self #'s; add to list*/
  end   /*i*/
                                                /*stick a fork in it,  we're all done. */

say n " self numbers were found." /*display the title for the output list*/ if tell then say list /*display list of self numbers ──►term.*/</lang>

output   when using the default input:
50  self numbers were found.
1 3 5 7 9 20 31 42 53 64 75 86 97 108 110 121 132 143 154 165 176 187 198 209 211 222 233 244 255 266 277 288 299 310 312 323 334 345 356 367 378 389 400 411 413 424 435 446 457 468

ten millionth self number

Translation of: Go (low memory)

<lang rexx>/*REXX pgm displays the Nth self number, aka Colombian or Devlali numbers. OEIS A3052.*/ numeric digits 20 /*ensure enough decimal digits for #. */ parse arg high . /*obtain optional argument from the CL.*/ if high== | high=="," then high= 100000000 /*Not specified? Then use 100M default*/ i= 1; pow= 10; digs= 1; offset= 9; $= 0 /*$: the last self number found. */

  1. = 0 /*count of self numbers (so far). */
    do while #<high;          isSelf= 1         /*assume a self number   (so far).     */
    start= max(i-offset, 0)
    sum= sumDigs(start)

       do j=start  to i-1
       if j+sum==i  then do;  isSelf= 0         /*found a   non  self number.          */
                              iterate           /*keep looking for more self numbers.  */
                         end
       jp= j + 1                                /*shortcut variable for next statement.*/
       if jp//10==0   then sum= sumDigs(jp)
                      else sum= sum + 1
       end   /*j*/

    if isSelf  then do;  #= # + 1               /*bump the count of self numbers.      */
                         $= i                   /*save the last self number found.     */
                    end
    i= i + 1
    if i//pow==0  then do;  pow= pow * 10
                            digs= digs + 1      /*bump the number of decimal digits.   */
                            offset= digs * 9    /*bump the offset by a factor of nine. */
                       end
    end   /*while*/

say say 'the ' commas(high)th(high) " self number is: " commas($) exit 0 /*stick a fork in it, we're all done. */ /*──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────*/ sumDigs: parse arg s 2 x; do k=1 for length(x) /*get 1st dig, & also get the rest.*/ 

                           s= s + substr(x, k, 1)  /*add a particular digit to the sum.*/
                           end  /*k*/;  return s

/*──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────*/ commas: parse arg _; do c=length(_)-3 to 1 by -3; _=insert(',', _, c); end; return _ th: parse arg th; return word('th st nd rd',1+(th//10)*(th//100%10\==1)*(th//10<4))</lang>

output   when using the default input:
the  100,000,000th  self number is:  1,022,727,208

Wren

Translation of: Go

Just the sieve based version as the low memory version would take too long to run in Wren.

Note that you need a lot of memory to run this as Bools in Wren require 8 bytes of storage compared to 1 byte in Go.

Unsurprisingly, very slow compared to the Go version as Wren is interpreted and uses floating point arithmetic for all numerical work. <lang ecmascript>var sieve = Fn.new { 

   var sv = List.filled(2*1e9+9*9+1, false)
   var n = 0
   var s = [0] * 8
   for (a in 0..1) {
       for (b in 0..9) {
           s[0] = a + b
           for (c in 0..9) {
               s[1] = s[0] + c
               for (d in 0..9) { 
                  s[2] = s[1] + d                   
                  for (e in 0..9) {
                       s[3] = s[2] + e
                       for (f in 0..9) {
                           s[4] = s[3] + f                           
                           for (g in 0..9) {
                               s[5] = s[4] + g
                               for (h in 0..9) {
                                   s[6] = s[5] + h
                                   for (i in 0..9) {
                                       s[7] = s[6] + i
                                       for (j in 0..9) {                                           
                                          sv[s[7] + j + n] = true
                                          n = n + 1
                                       }
                                   }                                    
                               }
                           }  
                       }
                   }
               }
           }
       }
   }
   return sv

}

var st = System.clock var sv = sieve.call() var count = 0 System.print("The first 50 self numbers are:") for (i in 0...sv.count) { 

   if (!sv[i]) {
       count = count + 1
       if (count <= 50) System.write("%(i) ")
       if (count == 1e8) {
           System.print("\n\nThe 100 millionth self number is %(i)")
           break
       }
   }

} System.print("Took %(System.clock-st) seconds.")</lang>

Output:
The first 50 self numbers are:
1 3 5 7 9 20 31 42 53 64 75 86 97 108 110 121 132 143 154 165 176 187 198 209 211 222 233 244 255 266 277 288 299 310 312 323 334 345 356 367 378 389 400 411 413 424 435 446 457 468 

The 100 millionth self number is 1022727208
Took 222.789713 seconds.
Retrieved from "https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Self_numbers?oldid=302849"