Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Why not give a separate page to each language for each task: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(using template)
(Why it copied a page when I signed it with ~~~~?)
Line 4: Line 4:


Why don't give a separate page for each implementation for each task?
Why don't give a separate page for each implementation for each task?
Then you can discuss each implementation separately, watch only implementations in your favorite languages ignoring the others, include all implementations for a given language on one page. [[User:Alexei Kopylov|Alexei Kopylov]] ([[User talk:Alexei Kopylov|talk]]) 16:03, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Then you can discuss each implementation separately, watch only implementations in your favorite languages ignoring the others, include all implementations for a given language on one page. --Alexei Kopylov 16:03, 10 November 2017 (UTC)}}
}}

Revision as of 16:17, 10 November 2017

Why not give a separate page to each language for each task
This is a particular discussion thread among many which consider Rosetta Code.

Summary

I am new here, sorry if this question have been already discussed.

Why don't give a separate page for each implementation for each task? Then you can discuss each implementation separately, watch only implementations in your favorite languages ignoring the others, include all implementations for a given language on one page. --Alexei Kopylov 16:03, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Property "Summary" (as page type) with input value "I am new here, sorry if this question have been already discussed.</br></br>Why don't give a separate page for each implementation for each task?</br>Then you can discuss each implementation separately, watch only implementations in your favorite languages ignoring the others, include all implementations for a given language on one page. --Alexei Kopylov 16:03, 10 November 2017 (UTC)" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process.

Discussion