Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Clearing breaks: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(New page: I don't like this <nowiki><br clear=all></nowiki> business (and the related "clear:both;" style). It looks really bad with the new skin: *http://rekaeuqs1.googlepages.com/cleartask.JPG *ht...) |
(Not sure I agree) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*http://rekaeuqs1.googlepages.com/clearunimpl.JPG |
*http://rekaeuqs1.googlepages.com/clearunimpl.JPG |
||
Either it needs to be fixed in the new skin or we need to stop using it. The <nowiki><pre></nowiki> boxes don't even overlap the div boxes in the new skin. If you haven't yet, try the new skin (My Preferences -> Skin -> Rosetta). --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 17:59, 23 June 2009 (UTC) |
Either it needs to be fixed in the new skin or we need to stop using it. The <nowiki><pre></nowiki> boxes don't even overlap the div boxes in the new skin. If you haven't yet, try the new skin (My Preferences -> Skin -> Rosetta). --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 17:59, 23 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
: But it was looking absolutely crap before with the default skin. Saying "but new users ought to first switch to a different skin" is kind of missing the whole damn point. Us regulars aren't the people for whom the look-and-feel needs to be optimized. (Perhaps the problem is reconstruable as a bug in the new skin...) —[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 22:26, 23 June 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:26, 23 June 2009
I don't like this <br clear=all> business (and the related "clear:both;" style). It looks really bad with the new skin:
Either it needs to be fixed in the new skin or we need to stop using it. The <pre> boxes don't even overlap the div boxes in the new skin. If you haven't yet, try the new skin (My Preferences -> Skin -> Rosetta). --Mwn3d 17:59, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- But it was looking absolutely crap before with the default skin. Saying "but new users ought to first switch to a different skin" is kind of missing the whole damn point. Us regulars aren't the people for whom the look-and-feel needs to be optimized. (Perhaps the problem is reconstruable as a bug in the new skin...) —Donal Fellows 22:26, 23 June 2009 (UTC)