Parse command-line arguments: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 922: Line 922:


=={{header|Rust}}==
=={{header|Rust}}==

Using the [https://docs.rs/structopt StructOpt]:

<lang rust>use structopt::StructOpt;
<lang rust>use structopt::StructOpt;



Revision as of 19:23, 4 October 2019

Parse command-line arguments is a draft programming task. It is not yet considered ready to be promoted as a complete task, for reasons that should be found in its talk page.

Command-line arguments can be quite complicated, as in:

nc   -v   -n   -z   -w   1   192.168.1.2   1-1000


Many languages provide a library (getopt or GetOpt) to parse the raw command line options in an intelligent way.

AutoHotkey

For AutoHotkey v1.1+ <lang AutoHotkey>;Get Arguments as an array if 0 > 0 { argc=%0% args:=[] Loop, %argc% args.Insert(%A_Index%) } else { ;if got no arguments, run self with arguments Run,%a_scriptFullpath% -i Lib\* -c files.c --verbose -o files.o --Optimze ExitApp }

Parse arguments

i:=0, msg:="" while( i++ < argc ) { c:=SubStr(args[i],1,1) if c in -,/ ; List all switch chars { if ( SubStr(args[i],1,2) == "--" ) ; if "--" is used like "--verbose" msg:=msg args[i] "`t:`tTrue (Boolean)`n" ; parse as boolean else msg:=msg args[i] "`t:`t" args[++i] "`n" } else msg:=msg args[i] "`t:`t(normal)`n" }

MsgBox % "Parsed Arguments :`n" msg</lang> Output (MsgBox):

Parsed Arguments :
-i        :  Lib\*
-c        :  files.c
--verbose :  True (Boolean)
-o        :  files.o
--Optimze :  True (Boolean)

AWK

Works with: gawk

<lang awk>#!/usr/bin/awk -E

  1. -E instead of -f so program arguments don't conflict with Gawk arguments

@include "getopt.awk" BEGIN {

 while ((C = getopt(ARGC, ARGV, "ht:u:")) != -1) {
   opti++
   if(C == "h") {
     usage()
     exit
   }
   if(C == "t") 
     tval = Optarg
   if(C == "u") 
     uval = Optarg
 }
 print "There are " opti " arguments."
 if(tval) print "-t = " tval
 if(uval) print "-u = " uval

}</lang>

Bracmat

Per default, Bracmat treats all arguments as expressions and parses and evaluates them from left to right. A call to the function arg$ pops the next argument from the list of arguments and returns it as an inert string in no need of further parsing and evaluation.

bracmat arg$:?a 123 arg$:?b 77 !a+!b:?c out$!c

Output:

200

C

The man page for getopt (man 3 getopt) provides better option handling with examples. But if you just want to parse one argument... (adapted from simple database task): <lang c>#include <stdio.h> int main(int argc, char **argv){

   int i;
   const char *commands[]={"-c", "-p", "-t", "-d", "-a", NULL};
   enum {CREATE,PRINT,TITLE,DATE,AUTH};
   if (argc<2) {

usage: printf ("Usage: %s [commands]\n"

           "-c  Create new entry.\n" 
           "-p  Print the latest entry.\n" 
           "-t  Sort by title.\n" 
           "-d  Sort by date.\n" 
           "-a  Sort by author.\n",argv[0]);
       return 0;
   }
   for (i=0;commands[i]&&strcmp(argv[1],commands[i]);i++);
   switch (i) {
   case CREATE:

...

   break;
   case PRINT:

...

   break;

... ...

   default:
   printf ("Unknown command..." ...);
   goto usage;
   }
   return 0;

}</lang>

Clojure

See Parsing Command-Line Arguments from O'Reilly's Clojure Cookbook github.

D

The getopt module in D's standard library is inspired by Perl's Getopt::Long module. The syntax of Phobos getopt infers the expected parameter types from the static types of the passed-in pointers. <lang d>import std.stdio, std.getopt;

void main(string[] args) {

   string data = "file.dat";
   int length = 24;
   bool verbose;
   enum Color { no, yes }
   Color color;
   args.getopt("length",  &length,  // Integer.
               "file",    &data,    // String.
               "verbose", &verbose, // Boolean flag.
               "color",   &color);  // Enum.
   writeln("length: ", length);
   writeln("file: ", data);
   writeln("verbose: ", verbose);
   writeln("color: ", color);

}</lang>

Usage example:
C:\getopt_test --verbose --length 12
length: 12
file: file.dat
verbose: true
color: no

Elixir

Elixir provides an option parser in a library module called OptionParser.

<lang elixir>#!/usr/bin/env elixir IO.puts 'Arguments:' IO.inspect OptionParser.parse(System.argv())</lang>

<lang bash>$ ./parse-args.exs --a --b --c=yes --no-flag --verbose -V -a=1 -b=t -- apple banana Arguments: {[a: true, b: true, c: "yes", no_flag: true, verbose: true],

["apple", "banana"], [{"-V", nil}, {"-a", "1"}, {"-b", "t"}]}</lang>

FreeBASIC

<lang freebasic>' FB 1.05.0 Win64

' Program (commandline.exe) invoked like this: ' commandline nc -v -n -z -w 1 192.168.1.2 1-1000

Dim argc As Integer = __FB_ARGC__ Dim argv As ZString Ptr Ptr = __FB_ARGV__

Print "The program was invoked with the following command line arguments:" Print

For i As Integer = 0 To argc - 1

  Print "Arg"; i + 1; " = "; *argv[i]

Next

Print Print "Press any key to quit" Sleep</lang>

Output:
The program was invoked with the following command line arguments:

Arg 1 = commandline
Arg 2 = nc
Arg 3 = -v
Arg 4 = -n
Arg 5 = -z
Arg 6 = -w
Arg 7 = 1
Arg 8 = 192.168.1.2
Arg 9 = 1-1000

Go

Most simply, implementing the suggested example from the talk page: <lang go>package main

import (

   "flag"
   "fmt"

)

func main() {

   b := flag.Bool("b", false, "just a boolean")
   s := flag.String("s", "", "any ol' string")
   n := flag.Int("n", 0, "your lucky number")
   flag.Parse()
   fmt.Println("b:", *b)
   fmt.Println("s:", *s)
   fmt.Println("n:", *n)

}</lang> Example runs:

> parse
b: false
s: 
n: 0

> parse -s bye -b
b: true
s: bye
n: 0

> parse -n 99 -s "say my name"
b: false
s: say my name
n: 99

Icon and Unicon

The Icon Programming Library provides a procedure for processing command line options. See the library reference for detailed documentation. The code below is an example.

<lang Icon>link options

procedure main(ARGLIST) /errproc := stop # special error procedure or stop() opstring := "f!s:i+r.flag!string:integer+real." # example opttable := options(ARGLIST,optstring,errproc)

if \opttable[flag] then ... # test a flag r  := opttable(real) # assign a real r2 := opttable(r) # assign another real s  := opttable(s) # assign a string i  := opttable(i) # assign an integer ... end</lang>

options.icn supports getting command-line options

J

When J starts up from the command line, the command line arguments are available in the array ARGV. On modern machines, the first command line argument is the name of the executable (the J interpeter, in this case).

Typically, the next argument (if present) is the name of a file whose contents will be executed.

Further command line analysis might include:

Test if an argument is present:
<lang j> (<'-b') e. ARGV</lang>
This is true if the argument is present and false, if it is not.
Or, find the name of an optional file:
<lang j> (ARGV i.<'-f') {:: }.ARGV,a:</lang>
This is the name of the first file named after the first -f argument, or empty if there was no such file.

Other concepts are also possible...

Julia

Works with: Julia version 0.6

Example taken from the official documentation of ArgParse docs.

<lang julia>using ArgParse

function parse_commandline()

   s = ArgParseSettings()
   @add_arg_table s begin
       "--opt1"
           help = "an option with an argument"
       "--opt2", "-o"
           help = "another option with an argument"
           arg_type = Int
           default = 0
       "--flag1"
           help = "an option without argument, i.e. a flag"
           action = :store_true
       "arg1"
           help = "a positional argument"
           required = true
   end
   return parse_args(s)

end

function main()

   parsed_args = parse_commandline()
   println("Parsed args:")
   for (arg,val) in parsed_args
       println("  $arg  =>  $val")
   end

end

main()</lang>

Kotlin

<lang scala>// version 1.0.6 (packaged as parse_cla.jar)

fun main(args: Array<String>) = println(args.asList())</lang>

Output:
c:\kotlin-compiler-1.0.6>java -jar parse_cla.jar nc -v -n -z -w 1 192.168.1.2 1-1000
[nc, -v, -n, -z, -w, 1, 192.168.1.2, 1-1000]

Mathematica

The command line is parsed and stored into a list of strings to ease manual handling by list processing functions. <lang Mathematica> $CommandLine -> {math, -v, -n, -z, -w, 1, 192.168.1.2, 1-1000} </lang>

PARI/GP

GP exists in a REPL and so it doesn't make sense to parse command-line arguments. But PARI can parse them just like C: <lang c>#include <pari/pari.h>

  1. include <stdio.h>

int main(int argc, char **argv){ if(strcmp(argv[1],"-n")) pari_printf("8 + 1 = %Ps\n", addii(int2u(3), gen_1)); return 0; }</lang>

Nim

<lang nim>import os import parseopt

proc main =

 # Directly accessing the app name and parameters
 echo "app name: ", getAppFilename().extractFilename()
 echo "# parameters: ", paramCount()
 for ii in 1 .. paramCount():    # 1st param is at index 1
   echo "param ", ii, ": ", paramStr(ii)
 echo ""
 # Using parseopt module to extract short and long options and arguments
 var argCtr : int
 for kind, key, value in getOpt():
   case kind
   of cmdArgument:
     echo "Got arg ", argCtr, ": \"", key, "\""
     argCtr.inc
     
   of cmdLongOption, cmdShortOption:
     case key
     of "v", "n", "z", "w":
       echo "Got a \"", key, "\" option with value: \"", value, "\""
     else:
       echo "Unknown option: ", key
   of cmdEnd:
     discard


main() </lang>

Sample command line:

parsecmdline ab -z cd ef -w=abcd --w=1234 -v -e -x 1-1000

Output:

app name: parsecmdline
# parameters: 10
param 1: ab
param 2: -z
param 3: cd
param 4: ef
param 5: -w=abcd
param 6: --w=1234
param 7: -v
param 8: -e
param 9: -x
param 10: 1-1000

Got arg 0: "ab"
Got a "z" option with value: ""
Got arg 1: "cd"
Got arg 2: "ef"
Got a "w" option with value: "abcd"
Got a "w" option with value: "1234"
Got a "v" option with value: ""
Unknown option: e
Unknown option: x
Got arg 3: "1-1000"

Perl

Use the Getopt::Long module:

<lang perl># Copyright Shlomi Fish, 2013 under the MIT/X11 License.

use strict; use warnings;

use Getopt::Long qw(GetOptions); my $output_path; my $verbose = ; my $length = 24;

GetOptions(

   "length=i" => \$length,
   "output|o=s" => \$output_path,
   "verbose!" => \$verbose,

) or die ("Error in command line arguments");

print "Outputting to '", ($output_path // '(undefined)'), "' path, with ",

   ($verbose ? "Verbosity" : "No verbosity"),
   " and a length of $length.\n";

</lang>

The output from it is:

$ perl getopt-test.pl --verbose -o foo.xml
Outputting to 'foo.xml' path, with Verbosity and a length of 24.
$ perl getopt-test.pl --verbose
Outputting to '(undefined)' path, with Verbosity and a length of 24.
$ perl getopt-test.pl --verbose --length=190
Outputting to '(undefined)' path, with Verbosity and a length of 190.
$ perl getopt-test.pl --verbose --length=190 -o test.txt
Outputting to 'test.txt' path, with Verbosity and a length of 190.

Perl 6

At the end of running any top-level code (which can preprocess the arguments if it likes), Perl 6 automatically examines any remaining arguments and transforms them into a call to a MAIN routine, if one is defined. The arguments are parsed based on the signature of the routine, so that options are mapped to named arguments. <lang perl6>sub MAIN (Bool :$b, Str :$s = , Int :$n = 0, *@rest) {

   say "Bool: $b";
   say "Str: $s";
   say "Num: $n";
   say "Rest: @rest[]";

}</lang>

Output:
$ ./main -h
Usage:
  ./main [-b] [-s=<Str>] [-n=<Int>] [<rest> ...]

$ ./main -b -n=42 -s=turtles all the way down
Bool: True
Str: turtles
Num: 42
Rest: all the way down

If there are multiple MAIN subs, they are differentiated by multiple dispatch. A help message can automatically be generated for all the variants. The intent of this mechanism is not to cover every possible switch structure, but just to make it drop-dead easy to handle most of the common ones.

Phix

<lang Phix>sequence res = command_line() ?res</lang>

Output:

Interpreted: res[1] is the interpreter, res[2] the source

> p test nc -v -n -z -w 1 192.168.1.2 1-1000
{"C:\\Program Files (x86)\\Phix\\p.exe","C:\\Program Files (x86)\\Phix\\test.exw","nc","-v","-n","-z","-w","1","192.168.1.2","1-1000"}

Compiled: both res[1] and res[2] are the executable

> p -c test nc -v -n -z -w 1 192.168.1.2 1-1000
{"C:\\Program Files (x86)\\Phix\\test.exe","C:\\Program Files (x86)\\Phix\\test.exe","nc","-v","-n","-z","-w","1","192.168.1.2","1-1000"}
> test nc -v -n -z -w 1 192.168.1.2 1-1000
{"C:\\Program Files (x86)\\Phix\\test.exe","C:\\Program Files (x86)\\Phix\\test.exe","nc","-v","-n","-z","-w","1","192.168.1.2","1-1000"}

Python

Version 2.3+ <lang Python> from optparse import OptionParser [...] parser = OptionParser() parser.add_option("-f", "--file", dest="filename",

                 help="write report to FILE", metavar="FILE")

parser.add_option("-q", "--quiet",

                 action="store_false", dest="verbose", default=True,
                 help="don't print status messages to stdout")

(options, args) = parser.parse_args()

example:

<yourscript> --file=outfile -q </lang>

PicoLisp

PicoLisp doesn't have a library to get options. Instead, the command line is parsed at startup and handled in the following way: Each command line argument is executed (interpreted) as a Lisp source file, except that if the first character is a hypen '-', then that arguments is taken as a Lisp function call (without the surrounding parentheses). For example, the command line <lang shell>$ ./pil abc.l -foo def.l -"bar 3 4" -'mumble "hello"' -bye</lang> has the effect that

  1. The file "abc.l" is executed
  2. (foo) is called
  3. The file "def.l" is executed
  4. (bar 3 4) is called
  5. (mumble "hello") is called
  6. (bye) is called, resulting in program termination

Command line arguments like "-v", "-n" and "-z" can be implemented simply by defining three functions 'v', 'n' and 'z'.

In addition to the above mechanism, the command line can also be handled "manually", by either processing the list of arguments returned by 'argv', or by fetching arguments individually with 'opt'.

PowerShell

Powershell functions and filters handle options organically, with advanced .NET support to handle complex and advanced options including aliases, ranges, sets, datatypes, and more. See more here. However, to parse options 'classically', you can write a custom parser. A slightly messy version (inspired by ruby optparse) that can only handle switches and relies on RegEx: <lang Powershell> $options = @{

       opt1 = [bool] 0
       opt2 = [bool] 0
       opt3 = [bool] 0
   }

$help = @"

   FUNCTION usage: FUNCTION [-p] [-w] [-h] [-c] <int><float><string>PARAMETERS...
   
   Lorem Ipsum blah blah blah
   
   NOTE something yada yada
   
   Options:         
       -p,--pxx    Name    Some option that has significance with the letter 'p'
       -w,--wxx    Name    Some option that has significance with the letter 'w'
       -c,--cxx    Name    Some option that has significance with the letter 'c'
       -h,--help   Help    Prints this message

"@

   function parseOptions ($argv,$options) {
       $opts = @()
       if (!$argv) { return $null }
       foreach ($arg in $argv) {
           # Make sure the argument is something you are expecting
           $test = ($arg -is [int]) -or 
                   ($arg -is [string]) -or
                   ($arg -is [float])
           if (!$test) {
               Write-Host "Bad argument: $arg is not an integer, float, nor string." -ForegroundColor Red
               throw "Error: Bad Argument"
           }
           if ($arg -like '-*') { $opts += $arg }
       }
       $argv = [Collections.ArrayList]$argv
       if ($opts) { 
           foreach ($opt in $opts) { 
               switch ($opt) {
                   {'-p' -or '--pxx'}   { $options.opt1 = [bool] 1 }
                   {'-w' -or '--wxx'}   { $options.opt2 = [bool] 1 }                    
                   {'-c' -or '--cxx'}   { $options.opt3 = [bool] 1 }
                   {'-h' -or '--help'}  { Write-Host $help -ForegroundColor Cyan; break 1 }
                   default { 
                       Write-Host "Bad option: $opt is not a valid option." -ForegroundColor Red
                       throw "Error: Bad Option"
                   }
               }
           $argv.Remove($opt)
           }
       }            
       return [array]$argv,$options
   }#fn

</lang> Usage (in some function or script): <lang Powershell>

  $argv,$options = parseOptions $args $options
   if ($options.opt3) {
       $foo = $blah - ($yada * $options.opt1) + ($yada * $options.opt2)        
       $bar = $argv | SomeOtherFilter | Baz
   }

</lang> Usage in shell: <lang shell> $> function -c --wxx arg1 arg2 </lang> Note that this works in Powershell. All of the arguments after the function name will be passed as strings to the function, which then calls them as an array with the automatic variable, $args. The custom parser/function does the work from there, turning the strings into flags and typed arguments. WARNING: This is reinventing the wheel to an extreme degree.

Racket

Racket has a good command-line parsing library, the following demonstrates some of its features:

<lang racket>

  1. !/usr/bin/env racket
  2. lang racket

(define loglevel 1) (define mode 'new) (define ops '()) (define root #f)

(command-line

#:multi
[("-v" "--verbose")    "more verbose"      (set! loglevel (add1 loglevel))]
[("-q" "--quiet")      "be quiet"          (set! loglevel 0)]
#:once-any
[("-i" "--in-place")   "edit in-place"     (set! mode 'in-place)]
[("-c" "--create-new") "create a new file" (set! mode 'new)]
[("-n" "--dry-run")    "do nothing"        (set! mode #f)]
#:once-each
[("-d" "--directory") dir "work in a given directory" (set! root dir)]
#:help-labels "operations to perform:"
#:multi
[("+l" "++line") "add a line"    (set! ops `(,@ops "add"))]
[("-l" "--line") "delete a line" (set! ops `(,@ops "delete"))]
[("-e" "--edit") "edit a line"   (set! ops `(,@ops "edit"))]
#:args (file . files)
(printf "Running on: ~a\n" (string-join (cons file files) ", "))
(when root (printf "In Dir:     ~a\n" root))
(printf "Mode:       ~s\n" mode)
(printf "Log level:  ~s\n" loglevel)
(printf "Operations: ~a\n" (string-join ops ", ")))

</lang>

Sample runs:

$ ./foo -h
foo [ <option> ... ] <file> [<files>] ...
 where <option> is one of
* -v, --verbose : more verbose
* -q, --quiet : be quiet
/ -i, --in-place : edit in-place
| -c, --create-new : create a new file
\ -n, --dry-run : do nothing
  -d <dir>, --directory <dir> : work in a given directory
 operations to perform:
* +l, ++line : add a line
* -l, --line : delete a line
* -e, --edit : edit a line
  --help, -h : Show this help
  -- : Do not treat any remaining argument as a switch (at this level)
 * Asterisks indicate options allowed multiple times.
 /|\ Brackets indicate mutually exclusive options.
 Multiple single-letter switches can be combined after one `-'; for
  example: `-h-' is the same as `-h --'

$ /tmp/zz.rkt -viqvvd /tmp +ll -el foo bar baz
Running on: foo, bar, baz
In Dir:     /tmp
Mode:       in-place
Log level:  2
Operations: add, add, edit, delete

REXX

╔═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ The subject of parsing text  (such as a command line)  is ingrained in the  ║
║ REXX language;  it has a PARSE instruction.  It's too rich to describe all  ║
║ its functionality/capabilities here,  but since the task isn't described,   ║
║ I'm assuming the    NC   [NetCat]  example  (or something like it)  is toe  ║
║ be parsed,  and I'm guessing at its syntax  (from other examples found on   ║
║ the web),  but I'll take a incomplete stab at it.                           ║
║                                                                             ║
║ For the most part,  every command appear to have their own rules for their  ║
║ operands (options),  as does the   NC   command.     For instance           ║
║                                                                             ║
║         nc  -u xxx -p port1 ···                                             ║
║                  and                                                        ║
║         nc  -u -p port1     ···                                             ║
║                                                                             ║
║ where the   -u   option has an operand in the first case,  but not the 2nd, ║
║ even though there is something following the   -u   option.                 ║
║                                                                             ║
║ It can only be assumed that any operand for the   -u   option can't start   ║
║ with a minus sign  [-].                                                     ║
╚═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝

<lang rexx>/*REXX program demonstrates one method to parse options for a command (entered on the CL*/ parse arg opts /*this preserves the case of options. */ opts=space(opts) /*elide superfluous blanks in options. */ !.= /*all options to be "null" (default).*/

  do  while opts\==                           /*keep parsing 'til all  opts  examined*/
  parse var opts x opts                         /*obtain a single keyword from options.*/
    select                                      /*hard-coded WHENs for option detection*/
    when x=='-e'   then parse var opts !.e_                                          opts
    when x=='-p'   then parse var opts !.p_                                          opts
    when x=='-n'   then !.z_=1
    when x=='-u'   then parse var opts !.uname_ !.unnn_                              opts
    when x=='-ul'  then parse var opts !.ul_                                         opts
    when x=='-vzu' then parse var opts !.vzu_   !.vzurange                           opts
    when x=='-w'   then parse var opts !.wStart_ !.waddr_ !.wrange_1 '-' !.wrange_2  opts
    when x=='-z'   then !.=1
    otherwise call sayer 'option  '      x      " isn't a known option."
    end     /*select*/
 end        /*do while*/
                                  /*check for conflicts here and/or validity of values.*/

if !.z_==1 & !.n_==1 then call sayer "N and Z can't both be specified."

if !.wrange_1\== then do /*see if it's a whole number (integer). */

                        if \isInt(!.wrange1_)  then call sayer "wRange isn't an integer."
                        yada yada yada
                         .
                         .
                         .
                        end
              ...stuff...
         ...more stuff...

...and still more stuff... exit /*stick a fork in it, we're all done. */ /*──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────*/ isInt: return datatype(arg(1), 'W') /*return 1 if argument is an integer*/ isNum: return datatype(arg(1), 'N') /*return 1 if argument is a number.*/ sayer: say; say '***error***' arg(1); exit 13</lang>

╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ Note:  a programming trick is to append (say)  an underscore [_]  to  ║
║        an option's name as to not preclude that variable being used   ║
║        elsewhere in the REXX program.   That way, the option  J  can  ║
║        be used, as well as the variable  J  in the program.           ║
╚═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝

Ruby

Ruby's standard library provides two different packages to parse command-line arguments.

  • 'getoptlong' resembles the libraries from other languages.
  • 'optparse' has more features.

Ruby with 'getoptlong'

<lang ruby>#!/usr/bin/env ruby

  1. == Synopsis
  2. pargs: Phone a friend
  3. == Usage
  4. pargs [OPTIONS]
  5. --help, -h:
  6. show usage
  7. --eddy, -e <message>
  8. call eddy
  9. --danial, -d <message>
  10. call daniel
  11. --test, -t
  12. run unit tests

require "getoptlong" require "rdoc/usage"

def phone(name, message) puts "Calling #{name}..." puts message end

def test phone("Barry", "Hi!") phone("Cindy", "Hello!") end

def main mode = :usage

name = "" message = ""

opts=GetoptLong.new( ["--help", "-h", GetoptLong::NO_ARGUMENT], ["--eddy", "-e", GetoptLong::REQUIRED_ARGUMENT], ["--daniel", "-d", GetoptLong::REQUIRED_ARGUMENT], ["--test", "-t", GetoptLong::NO_ARGUMENT] )

opts.each { |option, value| case option when "--help" RDoc::usage("Usage") when "--eddy" mode = :call name = "eddy" message = value when "--daniel" mode = :call name = "daniel" message = value when "--test" mode = :test end }

case mode when :usage RDoc::usage("Usage") when :call phone(name, message) when :test test end end

if __FILE__==$0 begin main rescue Interrupt => e nil end end</lang>

$ ./pargs.rb -h

Usage
-----
pargs [OPTIONS]

--help, -h:

   show usage

--eddy, -e <message>

   call eddy

--daniel, -d <message>

   call daniel

--test, -t

   run unit tests

$ ./pargs.rb -e Yo!
Calling eddy...
Yo!
$ ./pargs.rb --test
Calling Barry...
Hi!
Calling Cindy...
Hello!

Ruby with 'optparse'

<lang ruby>require 'optparse'

sflag = false longflag = false count = 0 percent = 50 fruit = nil

OptionParser.new do |opts|

 # Default banner is "Usage: #{opts.program_name} [options]".
 opts.banner += " [arguments...]"
 opts.separator "This demo prints the results of parsing the options."
 opts.version = "0.0.1"
 opts.on("-s", "Enable short flag") {sflag = true}
 opts.on("--long", "Enable long flag") {longflag = true}
 opts.on("-b", "--both", "Enable both -s and --long"
         ) {sflag = true; longflag = true}
 opts.on("-c", "--count", "Add 1 to count") {count += 1}
 # Argument must match a regular expression.
 opts.on("-p", "--percent PERCENT", /[0-9]+%?/i,
         "Percent [50%]") {|arg| percent = arg.to_i}
 # Argument must match a list of symbols.
 opts.on("-f", "--fruit FRUIT",
         [:apple, :banana, :orange, :pear],
         "Fruit (apple, banana, orange, pear)"
         ) {|arg| fruit = arg}
 begin
   # Parse and remove options from ARGV.
   opts.parse!
 rescue OptionParser::ParseError => error
   # Without this rescue, Ruby would print the stack trace
   # of the error. Instead, we want to show the error message,
   # suggest -h or --help, and exit 1.
   $stderr.puts error
   $stderr.puts "(-h or --help will show valid options)"
   exit 1
 end

end

print <<EOF Short flag: #{sflag} Long flag: #{longflag} Count: #{count} Percent: #{percent}% Fruit: #{fruit} Arguments: #{ARGV.inspect} EOF</lang>

$ ruby takeopts.rb -h
Usage: takeopts [options] [arguments...]
This demo prints the results of parsing the options.
    -s                               Enable short flag
        --long                       Enable long flag
    -b, --both                       Enable both -s and --long
    -c, --count                      Add 1 to count
    -p, --percent PERCENT            Percent [50%]
    -f, --fruit FRUIT                Fruit (apple, banana, orange, pear)
$ ruby takeopts.rb -v 
takeopts 0.0.1
$ ruby takeopts.rb -b -c
Short flag: true
Long flag: true
Count: 1
Percent: 50%
Fruit: 
Arguments: []
$ ruby takeopts.rb -ccccp90% -f oran -- -arg
Short flag: false
Long flag: false
Count: 4
Percent: 90%
Fruit: orange
Arguments: ["-arg"]

Rust

Using the StructOpt:

<lang rust>use structopt::StructOpt;

  1. [derive(StructOpt)]

struct Opt {

   #[structopt(short)]
   b: bool,
   #[structopt(short, required = false, default_value = "")]
   s: String,
   #[structopt(short, required = false, default_value = "0")]
   n: i32,

}

fn main() {

   let opt = Opt::from_args();
   println!("b: {}", opt.b);
   println!("s: {}", opt.s);
   println!("n: {}", opt.n);

}</lang>

Examples:

> parse
b: false
s: 
n: 0

> parse -s bye -b
b: true
s: bye
n: 0

> parse -n 99 -s "say my name"
b: false
s: say my name
n: 99

Scala

Library: Scala

<lang Scala>object CommandLineArguments extends App {

   println(s"Received the following arguments: + ${args.mkString("", ", ", ".")}")

}</lang>

Standard ML

Works with: SML/NJ
Works with: MLton

The following code listing can be compiled with both SML/NJ and MLton: <lang sml>structure Test = struct

exception FatalError of string

fun main (prog, args) = (let exception Args

val switch = ref false

fun do_A arg = print ("Argument of -A is " ^ arg ^ "\n") fun do_B () = if !switch then print "switch is on\n" else print "switch is off\n"

         fun usage () = print ("Usage: " ^ prog ^ " [-help] [-switch] [-A Argument] [-B]\n")

fun parseArgs nil = () | parseArgs ("-help"  :: ts) = (usage(); parseArgs ts) | parseArgs ("-switch"  :: ts) = (switch := true; parseArgs ts) | parseArgs ("-A" :: arg :: ts) = (do_A arg; parseArgs ts) | parseArgs ("-B"  :: ts) = (do_B(); parseArgs ts) | parseArgs _ = (usage(); raise Args)

in parseArgs args handle Args => raise FatalError "Error parsing args. Use the -help option."; (* Do something; *) OS.Process.success end) handle FatalError e => (print ("Fatal Error:\n"^e^"\n"); OS.Process.failure) end

(* MLton *) val _ = Test.main (CommandLine.name(), CommandLine.arguments())</lang>

SML/NJ

SML/NJ can compile source code to a "heap file", witch can than be executed by the interpreter with arguments given (see this entry on stackowerflow.com for more information). The source.cm file should lock like this: <lang>Group is

 SOURCE_FILE.sml
 $/basis.cm</lang>

To compile the program, use ml-build sources.cm. This should create a "heap file" sources.x86-linux, depending on your architecture. The heap file can be executed with sml @SMLload=sources.x86-linux ARGUMENTS, or the script heap2exec can be used to make a single executable.

MLton

MLton compiles the source file directly to a executable by invoking mlton SOURCE_FILE.sml.

Tcl

The following proc detects and removes argument-less (-b) and one-argument options from the argument vector. <lang Tcl>proc getopt {_argv name {_var ""} {default ""}} {

    upvar 1 $_argv argv $_var var
    set pos [lsearch -regexp $argv ^$name]
    if {$pos>=0} {
        set to $pos
        if {$_var ne ""} {set var [lindex $argv [incr to]]}
        set argv [lreplace $argv $pos $to]
        return 1
    } else {
        if {[llength [info level 0]] == 5} {set var $default}
        return 0
    }
}</lang>

Usage examples:

getopt argv -sep sep ";"     ;# possibly override default with user preference
set verbose [getopt argv -v] ;# boolean flag, no trailing word

Searching with -regexp allows to specify longer mnemonic names, so it still succeeds on longer flags, e.g.

$ myscript.tcl -separator '\t' ...

zkl

The Argh class provides command line parsing, it can do actions during parsing, leave it for you to do after parsing, print errors, the option list, short or long options, with or without option args, etc.

File myprogram.zkl: <lang zkl>var ip; argh := Utils.Argh( T("v","v","print version",fcn{println("Version stub")}), T("n","n","ignored"), T("z","z","zazzle"), T("+ip","","get IP address",fcn(arg){ip=arg}), ); parsedArgs := argh.parse(vm.arglist);

println("Unparsed stuff: ",argh.loners); println("The IP address is ",ip); foreach option,arg in (parsedArgs){

  switch(option)   {
     case("z") { println("zazzle") }
  }

}</lang>

zkl myprogram nc -v -n -z --ip 192.168.1.2 1-1000
Output:
Version stub
Unparsed stuff: L("nc","1-1000")
The IP address is 192.168.1.2
zazzle
zkl myprogram nc -v -n -z --ip
Output:
Option "ip" is missing an arg
Options:
  --ip <arg>: get IP address
  --n (-n) : ignored
  --v (-v) : print version
  --z (-z) : zazzle