Revision as of 08:59, 9 November 2011 (view source) rosettacode>EMBee m (oops) ← Older edit		Revision as of 09:44, 9 November 2011 (view source) 76.21.41.59 (talk) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 4: this page should be renamed from Category:Racket to [[Racket]], but i am not doing that now because i am not sure how that affects all the racket solutions. they may need to be moved to scheme first.--[[User:EMBee\|eMBee]] 07:54, 9 November 2011 (UTC) :There is some ambiguity about this. At which point does something become a separate language vs an implementation of the same language? Can the makers of an implementation simply decide that it is a new language? From what I hear, there are some incompatibilities between Racket and Scheme. Wikipedia currently calls Racket a programming language: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racket_(programming_language) which it does not do for other implementations of Scheme. Many questions on StackOverflow simply say "Racket" without mentioning "Scheme". --[[Special:Contributions/76.21.41.59\|76.21.41.59]] 09:44, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Category talk:Racket (view source)