Category talk:Perl 6: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(→‎Perl 6 ==> Raku: new section)
(GeSHi language refs)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
So, now it's Raku. Any precedent for renaming a language a Rosetta Code? --[[User:SqrtNegInf|SqrtNegInf]] ([[User talk:SqrtNegInf|talk]]) 23:26, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

== Perl 6 ==> Raku ==
== Perl 6 ==> Raku ==


So, now it's Raku. Any precedent for renaming a language a Rosetta Code? --[[User:SqrtNegInf|SqrtNegInf]] ([[User talk:SqrtNegInf|talk]]) 23:31, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
So, now it's Raku. Any precedent for renaming a language a Rosetta Code? --[[User:SqrtNegInf|SqrtNegInf]] ([[User talk:SqrtNegInf|talk]]) 23:31, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

:Well, Protuim got renamed to Peloton back in 2016 and that was a large pain in the butt... even though there was only about 40 or so Protium tasks completed and less than 6 months of history at the time. I did all the fix-up manually then. For this? It's going to be scripted if at all. 1100 and some-odd tasks and 10 years of history, commentary and talk to comb through? << Shudder >> Plus we'll lose syntax highlighting, so that's a major LTA too. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 12:11, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

::Looked at GeSHi–that's what is being used here on RC, right?–and it would seem simple enough to just duplicate the 'Perl 6' language definition file as 'Raku'? I could even see about updating it a bit, to make it a little bit less imperfect with P6/Raku... --[[User:SqrtNegInf|SqrtNegInf]] ([[User talk:SqrtNegInf|talk]]) 02:13, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 02:14, 15 November 2019

Perl 6 ==> Raku

So, now it's Raku. Any precedent for renaming a language a Rosetta Code? --SqrtNegInf (talk) 23:31, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Well, Protuim got renamed to Peloton back in 2016 and that was a large pain in the butt... even though there was only about 40 or so Protium tasks completed and less than 6 months of history at the time. I did all the fix-up manually then. For this? It's going to be scripted if at all. 1100 and some-odd tasks and 10 years of history, commentary and talk to comb through? << Shudder >> Plus we'll lose syntax highlighting, so that's a major LTA too. --Thundergnat (talk) 12:11, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Looked at GeSHi–that's what is being used here on RC, right?–and it would seem simple enough to just duplicate the 'Perl 6' language definition file as 'Raku'? I could even see about updating it a bit, to make it a little bit less imperfect with P6/Raku... --SqrtNegInf (talk) 02:13, 15 November 2019 (UTC)