Category talk:OoRexx: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (added comments, changed LPEX to LEXX, corrected spelling of ''dictionary''. -- ~~~~) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I adapted the ooRexx section to the best of my (current) knowledge |
I adapted the ooRexx section to the best of my (current) knowledge |
||
[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] 17:36, 22 June 2012 (UTC) |
[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] 17:36, 22 June 2012 (UTC) |
||
---- |
|||
The compatibility is vast and the differences are few. |
|||
If all the different interpreters were exactly the same then they wouldn't be different interpreters. |
|||
Perhaps the sentence should read ''It is possible to write Classic rexx code that won't run unchanged on ooRexx''. I have yet to see a case that could not be easily re-written without changing the meaning of the code in a way that will run on both regina and ooRexx. The wording that Gerard appears to be pressing for, would suggest that code from any classic Rexx interpreter would run on any other classic Rexx interpreter, but not ooRexx and that seems to me to serve the truth even less than saying ''fully compatible''. |
|||
--[[User:Sahananda|Sahananda]] 05:43, 26 June 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== Plagiarism == |
== Plagiarism == |
||