Category talk:HTML: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 11:31, 6 November 2009

Category?

I've written up a somewhat longer, slightly more-detailed version of this page, but before I put it up, I want to see if there's any reason not to move this to a category. There are only 2 pages that link to Category:HTML -- Empty Program#HTML and Basic Animation#JavaScript + HTML -- and I feel that making this a category might be overkill... or it might not be. After all, there's only so much one can do with a document layout language; most examples on RC are simply beyond plain HTML's capabilities. -- Eriksiers 23:18, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

It probably wants to be a bit like JSON. –Donal Fellows 11:31, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:18, 5 November 2009 (view source) Eriksiers (talk \| contribs) (category?)		Revision as of 11:31, 6 November 2009 (view source) rosettacode>Dkf (→‎Category?) Newer edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I've written up a somewhat longer, slightly more-detailed version of this page, but before I put it up, I want to see if there's any reason not to move this to a category. There are only 2 pages that link to [[:Category:HTML]] -- [[Empty Program#HTML]] and [[Basic Animation#JavaScript + HTML]] -- and I feel that making this a category ''might'' be overkill... or it might not be. After all, there's only so much one can do with a document layout language; most examples on RC are simply beyond plain HTML's capabilities. -- [[User:Eriksiers\|Eriksiers]] 23:18, 5 November 2009 (UTC)		I've written up a somewhat longer, slightly more-detailed version of this page, but before I put it up, I want to see if there's any reason not to move this to a category. There are only 2 pages that link to [[:Category:HTML]] -- [[Empty Program#HTML]] and [[Basic Animation#JavaScript + HTML]] -- and I feel that making this a category ''might'' be overkill... or it might not be. After all, there's only so much one can do with a document layout language; most examples on RC are simply beyond plain HTML's capabilities. -- [[User:Eriksiers\|Eriksiers]] 23:18, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

			: It probably wants to be a bit like [[JSON]]. –[[User:Dkf\|Donal Fellows]] 11:31, 6 November 2009 (UTC)