Category talk:GTK+: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(redirect gtk+ to gtk, or gtk to gtk+?) |
(Go with popularity of naming, not officiousness) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This page should redirect to Category:GTK (or viceversa?), and using libheader|GTK+ should be the same as using libheader|GTK (i.e. the examples with those categories should be seen altogether); Wikipedia redirect GTK to GTK+, but I would go for the opposite... --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 12:06, 8 July 2009 (UTC) |
This page should redirect to Category:GTK (or viceversa?), and using libheader|GTK+ should be the same as using libheader|GTK (i.e. the examples with those categories should be seen altogether); Wikipedia redirect GTK to GTK+, but I would go for the opposite... --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 12:06, 8 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
: As far as I'm aware almost everyone calls it “GTK”, so that's the name that we should use. —[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 12:51, 8 July 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:51, 8 July 2009
This page should redirect to Category:GTK (or viceversa?), and using libheader|GTK+ should be the same as using libheader|GTK (i.e. the examples with those categories should be seen altogether); Wikipedia redirect GTK to GTK+, but I would go for the opposite... --ShinTakezou 12:06, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- As far as I'm aware almost everyone calls it “GTK”, so that's the name that we should use. —Donal Fellows 12:51, 8 July 2009 (UTC)