Anonymous user
Category talk:AutoHotkey Originated: Difference between revisions
agree that there's no need for such a thing
(let's reduce matrix sparseness) |
(agree that there's no need for such a thing) |
||
Line 14:
I think it is less important to record for which language the first solution of a task was posted (or with which language in mind a task was designed :^). Rather, each language should strive to solve all tasks it can, and mark the others as "omit from", so that the matrix of tasks * languages is least sparse. --[[User:Suchenwi|Suchenwi]] 17:04, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
: I think there's no need for such a thing too. If a task has no pseudocode and task's author (or others) wants to point a language as a "good example" of how the task can be done, then it's enough to write it in the task someway. --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 21:51, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
| |||